References

  1. Borghans, J. A. M., de Boer, R. J., and Segel, L. A. (1996). Extending the quasi-steady state approximation by changing variables. Bull. Math. Biol. 58, 43-63 [PubMed]
  2. Cornish-Bowden, A. (1995). Fundamentals of Enzyme Kinetics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
  3. Duggleby, R. G. & Clark, R. B. (1991). Experimental designs for estimating the parameters of the Michaelis-Menten equation from progress curves of enzyme-catalysed reactions. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1080, 231-236 [PDF]
  4. Duggleby, R. G. (2001). Quantitative Analysis of the Time Courses of Enzyme-Catalyzed Reactions. Methods 24, 168-174 [PDF]
  5. Eadie, G. S. (1942). The Inhibition of Cholinesterase by Physostigmine and Prostigmine. J. Biol. Chem. 146, 85-93 [PDF]
  6. Haldane, J. B. S., and Stern, K. G. (1932). Allgemeine Chemie der Enzyme Steinkopff, Dresden and Leipzig pp. 119-120
  7. Hanes, C. S. (1932). Studies on plant amylases: The effect of starch concentration upon the velocity of hydrolysis by the amylase of germinated barley Biochem. J. 26, 1406-1421 [PDF]
  8. Hofstee, B. H. J. (1952). Specificity of esterases. I. Identification of two pancreatic aliesterases. J. Biol. Chem. 199, 357-364 [PubMed]
  9. Lineweaver, H., and Burke, D. (1934). The Determination of Enzyme Dissociation Constants J. Am. Chem. Soc. 56, 658-666
  10. Ritchie, R. J., and Prvan, T. (1996). A Simulation Study on Designing Experiments to Measure the Km of Michaelis-Menten Kinetics Curves. J. Theor. Biol. 178, 239-254
  11. Schnell, S., and Maini, P. K. (2000). Enzyme kinetics at high enzyme concentration. Bull. Math. Biol. 62, 483-499 [PDF]
  12. Segel, L. A. (1988). On the validity of the steady state assumption of enzyme kinetics. Bull. Math. Biol. 50, 579-593
  13. Segel, L. A., and Slemrod, M. (1989). The quasi-steady-state assumption: A case study in perturbation. SIAM Rev. 31, 446-477 [PDF]
  14. Tzafriri, A. R., and Edelman, E. R. (2005). On the validity of the quasi-steady-state approximation of bimolecular reactions in solution. J. Theor. Biol. 233, 343-350 [PDF]